From 768b8b29ff9e2b0a1118a9d2c39490493003b16d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: FalsePattern Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:11:12 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] chore: misc github additions --- .github/FUNDING.yml | 2 ++ CHANGELOG.md | 12 ++++++++++ CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .github/FUNDING.yml create mode 100644 CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md diff --git a/.github/FUNDING.yml b/.github/FUNDING.yml new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a0113cdf --- /dev/null +++ b/.github/FUNDING.yml @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +patreon: falsepattern +ko-fi: falsepattern \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md index 13bf889c..385e10e0 100644 --- a/CHANGELOG.md +++ b/CHANGELOG.md @@ -30,6 +30,18 @@ Changelog structure reference: - Most of the internals have been rewritten to be fully asynchronous, so freezes should happen way less +## [19.3.0] + +### Added + +- Toolchains, Run Configurations + - [Direnv](https://github.com/direnv/direnv) support + +### Fixed + +- Zig + - Missing description for string conversion intentions + ## [19.2.0] ### Added diff --git a/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md b/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..89090b12 --- /dev/null +++ b/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +# Code of Merit + +1. The project creators, lead developers, core team, constitute + the managing members of the project and have final say in every decision + of the project, technical or otherwise, including overruling previous decisions. + There are no limitations to this decisional power. + +2. Contributions are an expected result of your membership on the project. + Don't expect others to do your work or help you with your work forever. + +3. All members have the same opportunities to seek any challenge they want + within the project. + +4. Authority or position in the project will be proportional + to the accrued contribution. Seniority must be earned. + +5. Software is evolutive: the better implementations must supersede lesser + implementations. Technical advantage is the primary evaluation metric. + +6. This is a space for technical prowess; topics outside of the project + will not be tolerated. + +7. Non technical conflicts will be discussed in a separate space. Disruption + of the project will not be allowed. + +8. Individual characteristics, including but not limited to, + body, sex, sexual preference, race, language, religion, nationality, + or political preferences are irrelevant in the scope of the project and + will not be taken into account concerning your value or that of your contribution + to the project. + +9. Discuss or debate the idea, not the person. + +10. There is no room for ambiguity: Ambiguity will be met with questioning; + further ambiguity will be met with silence. It is the responsibility + of the originator to provide requested context. + +11. If something is illegal outside the scope of the project, it is illegal + in the scope of the project. This Code of Merit does not take precedence over + governing law. + +12. This Code of Merit governs the technical procedures of the project not the + activities outside of it. + +13. Participation on the project equates to agreement of this Code of Merit. + +14. No objectives beyond the stated objectives of this project are relevant + to the project. Any intent to deviate the project from its original purpose + of existence will constitute grounds for remedial action which may include + expulsion from the project. + +This document is adapted from the Code of Merit, version 1.0. +See: https://codeofmerit.org/.